Stoa vs Granola
Stoa vs Granola: AI meetings compared
Granola and Stoa solve different jobs. Granola is an AI notepad: you take rough notes during a call and it cleans them up afterward from the transcript. Stoa is the meeting itself, a live video room where an in-room agent captures decisions and writes runnable code while the team talks. If you only want better notes, Granola is excellent. If you want the meeting to produce decisions, specs, and working prototypes, that is what Stoa is built for.
| Feature | Stoa | Granola |
|---|---|---|
| Built-in video meeting | Yes, the call happens in Stoa | No, runs alongside your call |
| In-room AI agent that writes and runs code | Yes | No |
| Decision log with rationale | Yes, captured live | Notes and action items |
| Runs without a separate bot in the call | Yes, Stoa is the call | Yes, Granola is botless |
| Local-first context you own | Yes, syncable to disk | Notes export available |
| Pricing | Usage-based, $5/hour, no seats | Per-user monthly plans |
The bottom line
Pick Granola when you want a lightweight, mostly-solo notepad that tidies your notes after a call. Pick Stoa when a meeting should end with decisions, a spec, or a working prototype, captured live and owned by your team.
Frequently asked questions
Is Stoa a Granola alternative?
They overlap on capturing what happened in a meeting, but Stoa adds built-in video and an in-room agent that drafts artifacts and writes code during the call, where Granola focuses on cleaning up notes afterward.
Does Stoa need a meeting bot like other tools?
No. The video call happens inside Stoa, so the agent hears everything without a separate bot joining. Granola is also botless, capturing system audio on your machine.
How does pricing compare?
Stoa is usage-based at $5/hour with no per-seat fees. Granola uses per-user monthly plans. Which is cheaper depends on team size and how many hours you meet.